| Author |
| Posted on 2009-01-17 01:07:40 |
|
|
| laaran |
 |
 |
|
The top of the grid.
The grid that goes through the top of the Harz, the Externstein (both in Germany), the Pen y Fan (a mountain of Wales in United Kingdom), and Burgos and Grenada
(Madrid is just a detail, a late addition)
Why this latitude ?
The grid is obvious. Just use the Atlas Universalis, and read the latitude and longitude of all these cities.
Study also the difference of longitudes.
3° 36' = 1 / 100 of 360°
Study also the distance of Madrid to Burgos and Grenada. The golden number... With Teruel as right arm of the cross. But the left arm is just a mountain, with no city.
It existed before the saxons, before the mountain Pen y Fan was never in a saxon area.
That, many people know it, and hide it.
Why 51° 43' ?
That, some people know it. They were not french, and helped french people at one moment of their history.
To these people, thank you. |
|
|
|
| Author |
| Posted on 2009-01-17 01:16:01 |
|
|
| laaran |
|
|
|
In fact, is probably complicated for history.
Burgos and Grenada, and the mountains are old.
The one on the same latitude, that means something. But the Harz means nothing for this old period.
Then there was the cross with Madrid and Teruel and the golden number (the favorite number of Leonardo di Vinci around 1450) around 1400 or 1500.
And the latitude 51° 43', when was it ?
Probably not later than the Externstein. So maybe the 10th or the 11th century. Or maybe earlier.
And those who helped the french. That, it is after Madrid. I can prove it. But no one is interested.
Strange. Really everybody is scared.
I am sure that some americans know why. For example, some politicians who belong to a secret organization.. |
|
|
|
| Author |
| Posted on 2009-01-17 02:06:03 |
|
|
| laaran |
|
|
|
I made a mistake in the title.
It should be 51° 53'.
The mountains are in 51° 48' N (the top of the Harz) and 51° 52' N (for the Pen y Fan).
The theorical value is, hum, it depends on the shape of the earth.
It is between 51° 51' and 51° 55'.
It is really easy to compute it on a sphere, but as the earth is not a perfect sphere, it is really more difficult, and I don't know the exact exact value.
Anyway, that changes nothing for the question related to the french history.
This story is about a second value of the calculation, and this second value changes very little if we take 51° 48' or 51° 52' or 51° 53'.
Either english people of Wales, either german people of the Harz area helped the french once.
Also, it is maybe written in some history books. In fact, I didn't search. I spent too much time to write that in a tiny equation :( But the tiny equation is pretty. |
|
|
|
| Author |
| Posted on 2009-01-17 18:58:39 |
|
|
| laaran |
|
|
|
But the left arm is just a mountain, with no city.
For this sentence, the "just" is not correct.
Let's say rather : it is just a spanish cross, with feet in a muslim city (Grenade), and head in a catholic-nearly-integrist city (Burgos).
Do you understand why it does not work ? In fact, maybe a full catholic cross would not work either, but at least it would be common.
Also, I can't say something about the attitude of the staff of the german library, if they helped or not. I am not allowed to talk about it, and I must be more polite.
But I am allowed to tell about the content of the books.. And no one believes that there was something not connected to Rome in Europe before Charlemagne, so it is necessary to write. |
|
|
|
| Author |
| Posted on 2009-01-19 20:38:56 |
|
|
| laaran |
|
|
|
In the same serie, let's watch this painting of Charlemagne/Carolus Magnus from the painter Albrecht Dürer.
More exactly, just one object, the ball with a cross planted on it.
There are several representations of the first millenium after the first-death-of-the-man-who-never-dies. In none, Charlemagne is carrying this object.
There is one very serious representation, a mosaic, created on a wall of the church Saint-Jean-de-Latran near the Vatican, during the life of Charlemagne. This object is not present.
This ball-cross appeared for the first time (for a representation of Charlemagne) in 1512 !
When the painter Albrecht Dürer painted a Charlemagne carrying such an object.
So that proves that this addition is a late addition.
Today, it is common (many paintings of Charlemagne after 1500, and several statues of Charlemagne after 1500 present this object).
In fact, this object was "displayed" for several leaders from the end of the middle-age (to the current time). Not just for Charlemagne.
---------------------------------------------------------
But french people are ignorant.
In Paris, in the Louvre, there is a statue from around 900.
The link
(under the image, there is a zoom sign, just click to see a bigger picture)
A chief (with a crown) on a horse, carrying a ball. No cross, just a ball.
According to the nationalist french people, it is Charlemagne.
But why ?
The ball, it never appears before Dürer, and when it appears, Dürer places a cross on it.
No.
There is another possibility.
A horse, it can mean the chief of a migrating tribe. Saxon maybe.
Secondly, the ball, it seems connected to earth, the shape of earth. Like the knowledge concerning the mountains Harz and Pen y Fan ? The knowledge of those who united tribes in a saxon union ?
Saxon or not saxon. Just an union of people who were not friends with Charlemagne ? |
|
|
|