Forum

Iraq and chirac again
 
Forum index / Life in general Post reply | Create new thread
Author
Posted on 2006-10-13 23:53:58
laaran
[British television journalist Terry]Lloyd was killed, along with Lebanese interpreter Hussein Osman and French cameraman Fred Nerac, near the Shatt al-Basra Bridge outside Basra, Iraq's second city, on March 22, 2003, two days after the invasion was launched.
[...]
In a statement read out after the hearing in Oxford, Nerac's widow Fabienne said she would continue her "lonely vigil" to uncover what exactly happened to her husband, who is still officially classed as missing.


For the British journalist, this is not my problem.
For the French one, this is.
Because the body is missing.
How can a body be missing ? The muslims always gave back the bodies. Conclusion : the Americans removed the body. Question : why ?

Second point.
Chirac (or the French government) never asked for an official explanation for the missing body.
I don't understand. Really I don't understand. We don't ask for the truth about a french citizen ? Normally, we do, we always do, why not for this journalist ?

OK. I understand. Slaves will remains slaves, always.
So let's live as slaves. I don't care for what happens in the world, people can die in poor countries, bombs can fall. We are the slaves of the USA, because they saved us 60 years ago. We don't need to speak, our masters speak for us. And de Villepin, did the CIA pay you for the comedy in UN ?
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 12:16:23
Valeria13
Valeria Korneeva
Do you really think that such thread can be interesting for common auditory of this site? Look at our ages! I`m not sure in the success of such topic...
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 12:39:33
laaran
19 ?
That means you are allowed to vote ?
Or maybe not in Russia.
In France, you are allowed to vote when you are 18.

Hum.
I know.
You think : let's make our private life first, and studies, then get a job, then children. Then we can care for the public questions.
Hum.
I hope that some do not trust this order and this logic any more. We wanted to destroy religion ? Great, and I am the first who appreciate.
If we don't find something to replace it, quickly, then prepare for more blood.

Politic can replace religion ? Probably not, not after some events of the 20th century. But judging politicians can help, because they are public people.
I post about politicians, you can post about other public people (artists, sport champions...). As long as you judge and not just write : "oh, they are great".
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 12:46:19
laaran
BTW, thank you for bringing this thread to the top of the list :)
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 14:38:58
Valeria13
Valeria Korneeva
What does BTW mean?
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 14:45:56
Valeria13
Valeria Korneeva
And by the way, don`t think instead of me. You wrote: "You think..." But you really don`t know what I think indeed...I just guess that discussing politics is a little bit strange theme for "The Cardigans" fans...But all can be here!
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 14:54:12
laaran
BTW = by the way...

I just guess that discussing politics is a little bit strange theme for "The Cardigans" fans...But all can be here!
And I post pictures of cities. Is that better ?
Do I deserve some place in hell for all my bad actions ?
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 15:12:53
Valeria13
Valeria Korneeva
Answers for these questions can be known only for you...Oh, what a terrible word "rating" ;)
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 17:54:01
laaran
Rating is terrible ?
Because we have it so often at school ?
Author
Posted on 2006-10-25 18:10:53
Carrie-anne
Anya
I don't think that if you are young you should care about yourself and people that are close to you.I am not fond of politics, in fact I am tired of it because of endless elections in my country, but it should not make me not to care ....
 
Moderators: Antoine, Assaf, Oleg, daniel_o
 
 
Betatest: Forum search engine
 
Forum jump